Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 5;14(3):400–409. doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9352-7

Table I.

Characterization of Particle Sizes by Laser Diffraction for the Reference and Test Formulations and Lactose

Formulation Drug particle size (D50), μm Lactose brand and grade Drug concentrationa (RSD %),b albuterol base, % w/w Volume diameter (SDc), μm Lactose fine content,d %
D10 D50 D90 (D90–D10)/D50 Mean (SD)
Reference (Rotacaps) Milled 0.820 (3.76) 2.78 (0.09) 39.9 (1.10) 97.3 (1.85) 2.37 (0.02) 20.9 (0.48)
A 1.9 Respitose ML003, milled 0.797 (0.925) 3.48 (0.05) 34.4 (0.32) 102 (0.32) 2.86 (0.02) 22.9 (0.25)
B 1.9 Lactohale LH 200, milled 0.773 (0.984) 6.67 (0.11) 73.2 (0.39) 161 (0.37) 2.11 (0.01) 12.4 (0.10)
C 3.2 Respitose ML003, milled 0.785 (0.887) 3.85 (0.04) 35.3 (0.43) 107 (0.94) 2.91 (0.01) 22.0 (0.21)
D 3.2 Lactohale LH 200 + LH 300, millede 0.729 (0.967)f 3.13 (0.02) 58.7 (1.53) 144 (3.37) 2.40 (0.01) 24.0 (0.31)
Lactose only Respitose ML003, milled 4.00 (0.07) 35.7 (0.40) 106 (2.94) 2.84 (0.05) 20.8 (0.19)
Lactose only Lactohale LH 200, milled 9.97 (0.08) 74.9 (0.30) 158 (1.89) 1.97 (0.02) 10.0 (0.07)
Lactose only Lactohale LH 300, micronized 0.77 (0.01) 3.54 (0.03) 8.91 (0.03) 2.30 (0.05) 93.0 (0.08)

aThe mean of six measurements (25 mg per sample) in terms of albuterol base

bRelative standard deviation

cStandard deviation

dPercentage below 10 μm

e8.0 % Lactohale LH 300

fFormulation D was formulated 8.9 % below target albuterol concentration. For exploratory purposes, performance of the lower concentration formulation was studied in an attempt to offset the greater dispersion efficiency of the test product