Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 1;2(7):803–814. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.002410

Table 3. Probabilities for the models in tested C. grandiflora.

Model Subsample 1 Subsample 2 Subsample 3 Subsample 4
Local sampling
Standard neutral model 0.023906 0.021943 0.024364 0.017462
Population expansion model 0.025716 0.021559 0.023288 0.024967
Bottleneck model 0.030185 0.034777 0.036350 0.035327
Pooled sampling
Standard neutral model 0.022127 0.019107 0.025184 0.018780
Population expansion model 0.021171 0.023279 0.024462 0.023276
Bottleneck model 0.021300 0.038277 0.032474 0.041330
Scattered sampling
Standard neutral model 0.022910 0.018927 0.030752 0.019591
Population expansion model 0.065575 0.021527 0.024750 0.024492
Bottleneck model 0.039082 0.017925 0.021514 0.022461

ABC analysis (Lopes and Beaumont 2010) was used in each species on all four subsamples across all three sampling strategies. Probabilities correspond to the proportion of accepted simulations with an acceptance threshold of 0.05. Analyses are based on synonymous sites.