Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 27;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-13-15

Table 7.

Relative changes from baseline in UNa, FENa, and u-ENaCβ-CR in response to a hypertonic saline infusion (3%, 7 ml kg-1) in 21 patients with essential hypertension and 20 normotensive controls during HS and LS intake

60 Min 120 Min 180 Min PGLM RM
ΔUNa (%)

HS Patients 87.4 (49.5; 125.4)§ 112.4 (72.0; 152.8)*§ 64.6 (41.4; 87.7)§ P = 0.122

Controls 48.2 (7.8; 88.6)§ 54.6 (18.4; 90.8)§ 44.0 (20.2; 67.9)§

LS Patients 388.9 (108.6; 669.2) 475.2 (133.8; 816.6) 513.7 (145.9; 881.5) P = 0.363

Controls 241.3 (92.9; 389.7) 306.8 (109.3; 504.3) 379.0 (168.4; 589.5)

ΔFENa (%)

HS Patients 96.6 (63.2; 130.1)§ 107.4 (72.8; 142.1)*§ 75.8 (56.2; 95.4)§ P = 0.047

Controls 50.6 (14.0; 87.1)§ 54.1 (21.0; 87.3)§ 46.2 (20.6; 71.7)§

LS Patients 379.9 (145.4; 614.4) 442.9 (142.6; 743.2) 486.0 (166.5; 805.5) P = 0.323

Controls 238.7 (106.8; 370.6) 286.5 (120.0; 453.0) 365.3 (157.5; 573.1)

Δu-ENaCβ-CR (%)

HS Patients -5.2 (-15.7; 5.2) -4.1 (-12.7; 3.8) -3.5 (-12.0; 5.1) P = 0.311

Controls -1.7 (-9.6; 6.1) 8.3 (-7.6; 23.9) -1.8 (-10.8; 7.2)

LS Patients 5.2 (-5.7; 16.2) 13.9 (5.0; 22.7) 7.9 (-0.2; 16.0) P = 0.525

Controls -1.5 (-16.3; 13.2) 8.1 (-12.3; 28.5) 7.0 (-7.3; 21.3)

UNa, urinary sodium excretion rate; FENa, fractional sodium excretion; u-ENaCβ-CR, urinary ENaCβ excretion corrected for creatinine. Values are means (95% confidence intervals). PGLM RM: HS compared with LS, GLM Repeated Measures with time as within-subject factor and blood pressure as between-subject factor. * P < 0.05, patients vs. controls, Students t-test. § P < 0.05, HS compared with LS, paired samples t-test