Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 28;344:e4212. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4212

Table 3.

 Multiple logistic regression analysis showing odds ratios of articles being in high reprint versus control groups by design and funding

Journal RCT v other design Industry funding v other or none Mixed funding v other or none P value
Odds ratio (95% CI) P value Odds ratio (95% CI) Odds ratio (95% CI)
Lancet 1.27 (0.50 to 3.23) 0.62 12.43 (4.63 to 33.38) 5.13 (1.75 to 15.04) <0.001
Lancet Neurology 0.87 (0.11 to 7.12) 0.89 15.73 (0.93 to 264.88) 4.06 (0.96 to 17.12) 0.03
Lancet Oncology 0.55 (0.11 to 2.64) 0.46 27.36 (2.43 to 307.97) 2.64 (0.56 to 12.37) 0.003
BMJ 0.88 (0.35 to 2.21) 0.78 15.64 (1.75 to 139.48) 2.76 (1.16 to 6.60) 0.001
Gut 3.70 (1.03 to 13.31) 0.045 4.31 (1.02 to 18.25) 2.54 (0.83 to 7.78) 0.07
Heart 5.38 (0.98 to 29.36) 0.052 6.00 (1.08 to 33.33) 4.79 (1.07 to 21.41) 0.02
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 1.32 (0.23 to 7.69) 0.31 NA 10.15 (2.79 to 36.88) <0.001
Combined journals 1.04 (0.70 to 1.54) 0.85 8.64 (5.09 to 14.68) 3.72 (2.43 to 5.70) <0.001
I2 (%) (P value) 16.9 (0.30) 0.0 (0.70) 0.0 (0.74)

RCT=randomised controlled trial; NA=not applicable.