Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 28;18(24):3156–3166. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i24.3156

Table 2.

Outcomes of 7 included randomized controlled trials (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography/endoscopic sphincterotomy + laparoscopic cholecystectomy) vs (laparoscopic cholecystectomy+ laparoscopic common bile duct exploration)

Included studies Stone clearance from the CBD (%) Postoperative morbidity (%) Mortality (%) Conversion to other procedures (%) Number of procedures per patient Length of hospital stay (d) Total operating time (min) (SD or range) Hospitalization charges ($) (SD or range)
Bansal et al[5], 2010 86.7 vs 93.3 Not mentioned 0 vs 0 15.4 vs 6.7 Not mentioned 4 (2-11) vs 4.2 (3-9) 153 (120-240) vs ? Not mentioned
Rogers et al[24], 2010 96.8 vs 88.2 9.1 vs 10.5 0 vs 0 1.8 vs 3.5 2.0 vs 1.0 4.1 (3.5) vs 2.3 (1.9) 183 (39) vs 174 (67) 30 617 (16 384) vs 27 675 (11 256)
Rhodes et al[25], 1998 75 vs 75 15 vs 17.5 Not mentioned 0 vs 25 2.4 vs 1.3 3.5 (1-11) vs 1 (1-26) 105 (60-255) vs 90 (25-310) Not mentioned
Cuschieri et al[26], 1999 83.7 vs 82.6 12.5 vs 15.8 1.5 vs 0.8 14.7 vs 15 2.0 vs 1.2 9 (5.5-14) vs 6 (4.2-12) Not mentioned Not mentioned
Nathanson et al[27], 2005 71.1 vs 97.6 13.3 vs 17.1 0 vs 0 6.7 vs 4.9 2.3 vs 1.2 7.7 vs 6.4 147.9 vs 158.8 Not mentioned
Sgourakis et al[28], 2002 84.3 vs 85.7 18.8 vs 17.9 3.1 vs 0 15.6 vs 14.3 2.1 vs 1.1 9 vs 7.4 105 (60-255) vs 90 (70-310) Not mentioned
Noble et al[29], 2009 55.6 vs 100 29.8 vs 43.2 Not mentioned 42.6 vs 9.1 2.3 vs 1.0 3 (2-7) vs 5 (2-7) Not mentioned Not mentioned

CBD: Common bile duct.