Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 29;6:36. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2012.00036

Table 8.

Spatial distribution of the dendritic arbor.

Cluster 1 put-T2: Ad-NPY n = 11 Cluster 2 put-T1: Ad-SOM n = 6 Cluster 3 put-T2: non-Ad-PV/SOM n = 8 Cluster 4 put-T2: Ad-VIP/CR n = 4
(13) Dendritic Sholl (0–100 μm; %) 85.1 ± 19.6 56.1 ± 17.2 59.3 ± 12.1 54.4 ± 23.9
ANOVA: 0,01 >>C3, >C2, C4 >C1 >>C1 >C1
(14) Dendritic Sholl (100–200 μm; %) 12.4 ± 13.2 32.9 ± 10.0 32.5 ± 9.1 32.6 ± 12.2
ANOVA: 0.008 <<C2, C3, <C4 >>C1 >>C1 >C1
(15) Dendritic Sholl (200–300 μm; %) 2.2 ± 7.3 10.4 ± 10.3 7.9 ± 7.3 11.2 ± 13.8
ANOVA: 0.025 <<C3, <C2 >C1
(16) Dendritic Sholl (>300 μm; %) 0.2 ± 0.7 0.6 ± 1.4 0.3 ± 0.7 1.7 ± 3.5
ANOVA: N.S.
(17) Vertical extent (%) 40.8 ± 13.6 42.9 ± 22.6 43.9 ± 20.2 60.3 ± 28.0
ANOVA: N.S.
(18) Horizontal extent (%) 30.6 ± 13.2 31.6 ± 15.5 29.2 ± 14.5 19.6 ± 19.6
ANOVA: N.S.

n, number of cells; N.S., non-significant; <, <<, and <<<, inferior with p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01, and p ≤ 0.001, respectively; >, >>, and >>>, superior with p ≤ 0.05, p ≤ 0.01, and p ≤ 0.001, respectively; C1, cluster 1; C2, cluster 2; C3, cluster 3; C4, cluster 4.