Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 29;6:42. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00042

Table 2.

Comparison of physiological AHP data with basal model parameters.

Current Model or tissue, species Conducta gAHP (pS) Equilb EAHP (mV) Amplitude (mV) Rise τr (ms) Fall τf (ms) References
fAHP Spiking Model 0.8 −65 6.7 0.1 2.0 n/a
Rat Hippocampus n/a −65 7 n/a 2–5 (Storm, 1987)
Human Neocortex n/a −65 n/a n/a n/a (Lorenzon and Foehring, 1992)
Cat Sensorimotor n/a −71 10 n/a n/a (Schwindt et al., 1988a)
mAHP Spiking Model 0.04 −97 2.7 18 164 n/a
Rat Neocortex n/a −97 5.3 18 164 (Lee et al., 2005)
Human Neocortex n/a −93 1.6 n/a 38–60 (Lorenzon and Foehring, 1992)
Cat Sensorimotor n/a −100 n/a n/a n/a (Schwindt et al., 1988a)
sAHP Spiking Model 0.02 −100 1.9c 225 2200 n/a
Rat Neocortex n/a −100 7.5c 225 3691 (Lee et al., 2005)
Human Neocortex n/a −87 1.8c n/a 687–999 (Lorenzon and Foehring, 1992)
Cat Sensorimotor n/a −99 2.5c n/a n/a (Schwindt et al., 1988a,b)
a

Conduct = Conductance,

b

Equil = Equilbrium;

c

After 10 spikes.