Table 5.
Performance comparison between Renno et al. method and Zulkifley et al. algorithm.
Method | TER | TPR | FPR |
---|---|---|---|
Renno et al. | 5.055% | 0.891 | 0.053 |
Zulkifley et al. | 0.047% | 0.699 | 0 |
Performance comparison between Renno et al. method and Zulkifley et al. algorithm.
Method | TER | TPR | FPR |
---|---|---|---|
Renno et al. | 5.055% | 0.891 | 0.053 |
Zulkifley et al. | 0.047% | 0.699 | 0 |