Skip to main content
. 2012 May 2;12(5):5623–5649. doi: 10.3390/s120505623

Table 8.

Performance comparison between the methods by Varcheie et al. and Zulkifley et al.

Method Video TER TPR FPR
Varcheie et al. Video 1 35.36% 0.792 0.391
Zulkifley et al. Video 1 3.87% 0.950 0.035

Varcheie et al. Video 4 1.318% 0.296 0.002
Zulkifley et al. Video 4 0.880% 0.655 0.004

Varcheie et al. Video 5 3.815% 0.462 0.027
Zulkifley et al. Video 5 0.549% 0.534 0.004