Skip to main content
. 2012 May 10;12(5):5996–6022. doi: 10.3390/s120505996

Table 1.

Comparison of analytical performance of CNT/Ni nanocomposite sensor with different nonenzymatic glucose biosensors [79].

Electrode type Applied potential
(mV)
Sensitivity
(μA·mM−1·cm−2)
Linear range Detection Limit Reference
Nanoporous PtPb −80 10.8 1–16 mM N/A [83]
Mesoporous Pt +400 9.6 0–10 N/A [84]
Pt-Pb/CNTs +300 17.8 Up to 11 mM 1.0 μM [85]
Porous Au +350 11.8 2–10 mM 5 μM [86]
MnO2/MWCNTs +300 33.19 10 μM–28 mM 10 μM [75]
Cu/MWCNTs +650 251.4 0.7–3.5 mM 0.21 μM [73]
Cu nanocubes/MWCNTs +550 1,096 1 μM–7.5 mM 1 μM [87]
NiO/MWCNTs +500 1,770 10 μM–7 mM 2 μM [81]
NiNP/SMWNTs +400 1,438 1 μM–1 mM 0.5 μM [88]
Ni(OH)2/CILE +550 202 0.05–23 mM 6 μM [89]
Electrospun NiCFP +600 V 420.4 2 μM–2.5 mM 1 μM [90]
Ni nanowire arrays +550 V 1,043 0.5 μM–7 mM 0.1 μM [76]
CNT/Ni +525 1,433 5 μM–7 mM 1 μM [79]