Skip to main content
. 2012 May 22;12(5):6712–6726. doi: 10.3390/s120506712

Table 3.

Comparison of star centroiding against blurred star image.

Index of star point Ideal coordinates (pixel) Coordinates of blurred star image (pixel) Coordinates of restored star image (pixel)
1 (1.4757, 17.4887) (2.5754, 15.0621) (1.6321, 17.7413)
2 (61.1800, 247.9956) (60.3000, 247.2000) (61.0166, 247.6088)
3 (66.3157, 72.2644) (65.5620, 71.5855) (66.5137, 72.4756)
4 (67.0611, 199.5018) (66.2736, 198.5205) (67.1176, 199.8830)
5 (106.2782, 235.2798) (105.0847, 234.3384) (106.5062,235.5103)
6 (134.6371, 68.7471) (133.4000, 68.0637) (134.9628, 69.0000)
7 (150.0000, 218.0000) Fail (150.4107, 218.5203)
8 (200.5139, 20.3319) Fail (200.8509, 20.9140)
9 (203.0953, 56.8732) (201.6690, 56.0245) (203.2726, 56.9546)
10 (201.2458, 251.7475) Fail (200.8412,251.3327)
11 (223.0692, 113.0331) (222.3383, 112.0692) (223.1885,113.1873)
12 (231.4061, 10.9092) Fail (231.8121, 11.4121)
13 (236.5062, 5.5021) (235.1504, 7.4118) (236.2813, 5.7401)
14 (244.0000, 58.0000) Fail (244.5132, 58.6318)
15 (269.2561, 139.0000) (268.2537, 137.5502) (269.3864,139.1944)
16 (271.5072, 114.7826) (270.5577, 113.3748) (271.6662,114.8652)
17 (299.0000, 145.0000) Fail (299.5125, 145.4218)