Table 1. Study characteristics of each included study.
Reference number | Author | Publication year | Sample origin | Messenger RNA quantification method | Housekeeping gene | Number of subjects | Test results | |||
TP | FP | FN | TN | |||||||
9 | Lipman et al. | 1994 | graft biopsy | competitive RT-PCR | GAPDH | 26 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
25 | Netto et al. | 2002 | graft biopsy | RT-PCR | β-actin | 29 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 21 |
PBL | RT-PCR | β-actin | 29 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 22 | |||
26 | Vasconcellos et al. | 1998 | graft biopsy | competitive RT-PCR | GAPDH | 31 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 18 |
PBL | competitive RT-PCR | GAPDH | 31 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 17 | |||
27 | Dias et al. | 2008 | PBL | RT-PCR | cyclophilin | 48 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 21 |
urine | RT-PCR | cyclophilin | 50 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 26 | |||
28 | Sabek et al. | 2002 | PBL | RT-PCR | 18s rRNA | 27 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 14 |
29 | Lipman et al. | 1998 | graft biopsy | competitive RT-PCR | GAPDH | 21 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 10 |
30 | Strehlau et al. | 1997 | graft biopsy | competitive RT-PCR | GAPDH | 27 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 11 |
31 | Li et al. | 2001 | urine | RT-PCR | cyclophilin | 44 | 20 | 3 | 4 | 17 |
32 | Øzbay et al. | 2009 | urine | real-time quantitative RT-PCR | cyclophilin | 41 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 13 |
33 | Galante et al. | 2006 | urine | real-time quantitative RT-PCR | cyclophilin | 24 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
34 | Shin et al. | 2005 | PBL | competitive RT-PCR | β-actin | 15 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
35 | Simon et al. | 2003 | PBL | real-time quantitative RT-PCR | 18s rRNA | 16 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
36 | Dugr’e et al. | 2000 | PBL | RT-PCR | β-actin | 21 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 12 |
37 | Dias et al. | 2004 | graft biopsy | RT-PCR | GAPDH | 21 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
Abbreviations: TP, true positive; FP, false positive; FN, false negative; TN, true negative; PBL, peripheral blood leukocyte; RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.