Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 19;13(4):561–571. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0331-6

TABLE 1.

Subject and tinnitus characteristics (n = 20) between good (>70% suppression) and poor (<50% suppression) responders

Good responders (n = 7) Poor responders (n = 13) P value
Subject characteristics
Age (years) 57 (16) 62 (9) 0.75
Pure tone average threshold at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz 42 (22) 53 (14) 0.19
Self-reported noise exposure—no
No 3 6 1.0
Yes 4 7
Self-reported insomnia—no
No 3 6 1.0
Yes 4 7
Self-reported anxiety—no
No 4 7 1.0
Yes 3 6
Self-reported depression—no
No 4 10 0.61
Yes 3 3
Beck Depression Inventory (0–63) 12 (9) 7 (7) 0.25
Beck Anxiety Inventory (0–63) 10 (10) 9 (12) 0.69
Tinnitus characteristics
Localization of tinnitus—no
Unilateral, right 0 0 0.23
Unilateral, left 2 2
Bilateral 5 11
Subjective judgment of tinnitus type—no
Tonal 1 4 0.69
Non-tonal 3 5
Both 3 4
Tinnitus duration (years) 18 (15) 18 (18) 0.69
Tinnitus pitch-matched frequency or Tf (Hz) 6929 (2090) 7123 (1691) 0.82
Hearing threshold at Tf (dB SPL) 58 (25) 79 (13) 0.07
Equal loudness level at Tf (dB SPL) 69 (23) 84 (14) 0.14
Equal loudness level atTf(dB SL) 12 (4) 6 (5) 0.02
Tinnitus ranking (0–10) 4 (2) 6 (1) 0.03
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (0–100) 52 (35) 42 (22) 0.53
Tinnitus Severity Index (0–100) 31 (14) 33 (8) 0.82

Wherever appropriate, mean and SD data are presented with SD in parenthesis next to the mean. Tinnitus characteristics of the present subjects were generally consistent with that reported in previous studies (e.g., Reed 1960; Pan et al. 2009a)