Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 30;97(6):E1032–E1042. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2216

Table 4.

Association of genotypes and hot flashes, adjusted OR with 95% CI

Gene variant Variant vs. reference genotype comparison European-Americans
African-Americans
HF Moderate and severe HF HF Moderate and severe HF
COMT Val158Met +/+, +/− vs. −/− 0.71 (0.31–1.60) 1.21 (0.48–3.04) 1.30 (0.59–2.88) 1.44 (0.67–3.09)
+/− vs. −/− 0.63 (0.23–1.69) 1.17 (0.45–3.09) 0.97 (0.42–2.23) 1.03 (0.45–2.37)
+/+ vs. −/− 0.75 (0.32–1.79) 1.30 (0.44–3.84) 6.67 (0.80–55.67) 4.20 (1.13–15.59)a
CYP3A4*1B +/+, +/− vs. −/− 1.33 (0.38–4.70) 0.68 (0.16–2.86) 1.10 (0.39–3.13) 1.09 (0.39–3.04)
+/− vs. −/− 1.06 (0.28–4.0) 0.42 (0.08–2.21) 1.31 (0.42–4.06) 1.03 (0.39–3.53)
+/+ vs. −/− b b 0.91 (0.29–2.82) 1.17 (0.39–3.53)
CYP1A2*1F +/+, +/− vs. −/− 0.96 (0.32–2.88) 1.60 (0.41–6.18) 1.00 (0.32–3.10) 1.69 (0.53–5.43)
+/− vs. −/− 1.47 (0.45–4.85) 1.72 (0.42–7.13) 1.31 (0.39–4.39) 1.91 (0.56–6.58)
+/+ vs. −/− 0.77 (0.24–2.42) 1.50 (0.37–6.07) 0.77 (0.23–2.56) 1.49 (0.43–5.16)
CYP1B1*3 +/+, +/− vs. −/− 1.18 (0.58–2.42) 0.88 (0.41–1.91) 2.24 (0.49–10.24) 6.57 (0.73–58.82)
+/− vs. −/− 1.18 (0.56–2.51) 0.82 (0.36–1.86) 1.38 (0.61–13.89) 5.34 (0.80–51.40)
+/+ vs. −/− 1.18 (0.42–3.30) 1.10 (0.37–3.31) 2.92 (0.61–13.89) 7.25 (0.79–65.89)
CYP1B1*4 +/+, +/− vs. −/− 1.39 (0.66–2.92) 0.77 (0.35–1.79) 0.11 (0.02–0.48)c 0.51 (0.79–65.89)
+/− vs. −/− 1.38 (0.64–2.94) 0.82 (0.36–1.88) 0.11 (0.02–0.48) 0.51 (0.79–65.89)
+/+ vs. −/− 1.70 (0.09–33.51) b b b

Odds ratios adjusted for age, BMI, alcohol consumption, and menopausal stage.

a

P = 0.03.

b

Estimate uninterpretable due to insufficient data.

c

P = 0.003.