Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 21;97(6):1913–1921. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3299

Table 2.

Genotype distributions and OR estimates for DTC, pooled, non-Hispanic whites only and by study center

ATM SNP ID Genotype Inheritance modela Pooled population
Non-Hispanic Whites
SUC population
UTMDACC population
No. of cases/controls Adjusted OR (95% CI)b No. of cases/controls Adjusted OR (95% CI)b No. of cases/controls Adjusted OR (95% CI)b No. of cases/controls Adjusted OR (95% CI)b
rs228589 TT Dominant 227/294 1.0 178/241 1.0 116/126 1.0 111/168 1.0
TA/AA 363/587 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 280/441 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 173/244 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 190/343 0.8 (0.6–1.1)
rs189037 AA Dominant 215/277 1.0 170/233 1.0 105/112 1.0 110/165 1.0
AG/GG 375/606 0.8 (0.6–1.0) 288/452 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 184/260 0.8 (0.5–1.1) 191/346 0.8 (0.6–1.1)
rs1800054 CC 576/868 1.0 445/671 1.0 280/369 1.0 296/499 1.0
CG 16/16 1.6 (0.8–3.4) 14/14 1.5 (0.7–3.4) 9/4 3.6 (0.9–14.1) 7/12 1.0 (0.4–2.7)
rs4986761 TT 574/860 1.0 441/668 1.0 277/363 1.0 297/497 1.0
TC 18/22 1.2 (0.6–2.4) 18/15 1.8 (0.9–3.7) 12/8 1.9 (0.7–5.1) 6/14 0.8 (0.3–2.1)
rs1800057 CC Dominant 550/844 1.0 425/655 1.0 271/355 1.0 279/489 1.0
CG/GG 36/32 1.9 (1.1–3.1) 29/25 1.8 (1.0–3.1) 17/11 2.3 (1.0–5.6) 19/21 1.6 (0.9–3.1)
rs1801516 GG Dominant 483/697 1.0 366/519 1.0 244/305 1.0 239/392 1.0
GA/AA 109/188 0.9 (0.7–1.1) 93/167 0.8 (0.6–1.1) 45/69 0.8 (0.5–1.2) 64/119 0.9 (0.6–1.3)

SUC, State University of Campinas; UTMDACC, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. P < 0.05 is shown in bold.

a

The best model of inheritance for each SNP was determined using Akaike information criterion, and only the genotype distribution and OR under the best model are provided.

b

OR adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and study center.