Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 Nov 10;50(1):96–103. doi: 10.1597/11-132

TABLE 4.

Significant tests for G×G interaction among 111 markers in 10 different FGF/FGFR genes in 297 CL/P case-parent trios from 4 populations based on 4df LRT testing for 2-way interaction

First gene Second gene Marker 1 Marker 2 Test statistic P-value
Gene snpl Chr snpl Gene snp2 Chr snp2 SNP1 SNP2
FGF18 5 FGF10 5 RS4559013 RS11750845 14.255 0.0065
FGF18 5 FGF10 5 RS4076077 RS11750845 14.300 0.0064
FGF18 5 FGF10 5 RS4076077 RS1482679 14.156 0.0068
FGF18 5 FGF10 5 RS3934591 RS1482679 17.743 0.0014
FGF18 5 FGFR1 8 RS6887323 RS2978073 13.604 0.0087
FGF18 5 FGF3 11 RS6887323 RS1893047 15.135 0.0044
FGF18 5 FGF3 11 RS2043278 RS11263592 14.199 0.0067
FGF18 5 FGF3 11 RS2043278 RS1893047 13.958 0.0074
FGF18 5 FGF9 13 RS2043278 RS12870202 23.854 0.0001*
FGFR2 10 FGF10 5 RS2981430 RS593307 13.556 0.0089
FGFR2 10 FGF10 5 RS2981430 RS339502 13.815 0.0079
FGFR2 10 FGF10 5 RS2981430 RS1384449 14.338 0.0063
FGFR2 10 FGFR1 8 RS2981427 RS4733930 15.973 0.0031
FGF3 11 FGFBP1 4 RS11263592 RS732245 13.590 0.0087
FGF3 11 FGFBP1 4 RS11263587 RS732245 13.563 0.0088
FGF9 13 FGFR1 8 RS6490667 RS4733930 14.010 0.0073
*

Only this 2–SNP interaction remained significant after 1,000 permutations with P value of 0.019.