Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun 1;4(9):1–70.

Table 7: Summary of Findings From Studies Reporting on the Effectiveness of BIS Monitors To Reduce Recovery Time* (cont).

Study
(year)
Nelskyla et al.
(2001) (43)
Guignard et al.
(2001) (44)
Pavanti et al.
(2001) (45)
Study type RCT

This study hypothesized that BIS-guided anesthesia lowers the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting and improves the time to recovery and home readiness.
Prospective and controlled non-RCT done in 2 phases as follows:

Phase 1 had 41 patients (SP) Phase 2 had 39 patients (BIS-guided anesthesia)
RCT

In the BIS group, the anesthetics were given according to a BIS value rate of 40 to 60.

In the SP group, the anesthetics were given based on the anesthesiologist’s decision
Level of evidence 1 3 1
Study population Women scheduled for gynecologic laparoscopy (excluding tubal ligations) Patients undergoing various surgical procedures (hernia repair, thyroidectomy, gynecological procedures, cholecystectomy, transurethral prostatectomy, colectomy, and venous stripping) Patients undergoing abdominal surgery
Number of subjects 62 (BIS, 32; SP, 30) 80 90 (45 per group)
Mean age, years (SD) BIS: 32 (6)
SP: 32 (6)
BIS: 55 (14)
SP: 49 (14)
Mean: ranged from 42 to 48
Premedication Glycopyrrolate None Diazepam
Anesthetic technique Propofol, sevoflurane, and nitrous oxide Sufentanil, isoflurane, and propofol Remifentanil and sevoflurane
Tracheal intubation Yes Yes Yes
BIS values Median BIS during surgery: BIS: 54 (range, 49–61)
SP: 55 (range, 30–65)
BIS: Between 40 and 60 during surgery and 60-70 during the last 15 minutes before surgery ended Range: 40–60