Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun 1;4(7):1–98.

Table 10: ANOVAs for Clinical Ratings in Patients With Major Depression Treated With ECT or rTMS, From Grunhaus et al. (59).

  Group Effect Time Effect Interaction
Rating Scale F (df) P F (df) P F (df) P
ANOVA with Repeated Measures of Absolute Scores            
  HRSD .1(1, 38) ns 60.9(2, 76) .01 .1(2, 76) ns
  GDR .1(1, 38) ns 69.3(2, 76) .01 .3(2, 76) ns
  PSQI .02(1, 38) ns 5.3(2, 76) .01 2.5(2, 76) ns
  MMSE 3.1(1, 34 ns .9(2, 68) ns .5(2, 68) ns
ANOVA with Repeated Measures of Change Scoresa            
  BPRS 1.9(1, 38) ns 3.7(1, 38) .05 .05(1, 38) ns
  GAF 2.7(1, 38) ns 5.0(1, 38) .05 .3(1, 38) ns

ANOVA, analysis of variance; ECT electroconvulsive therapy; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; HRSD, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; GDR, Global Depression Scale; PSQL, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; BPRS, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, GAF, Global Assessment of Function.

a

Performed on scales with significant baseline differences.

Reprinted from Biological Psychiatry, 53(4), Grunhaus L, Schreiber S, Dolberg OT, Polak D, Dannon PN. A randomized controlled comparison of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in severe and resistant nonpsychotic major depression, p. 324-331, Copyright 2003, with permission from the Society of Biological Psychiatry