Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 19;8:295–306. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S24239

Table 1.

Studies of denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mass

Study Duration Extent of bone disease Total study size (plc) [60 mg/6 months] Results

Fractures % BMD [% change versus plc]
McClung et al32 12 months Osteopenia or osteoporosis (T-score < −1.8) 412 (46) [47] No difference in the sum of denosumab groups compared with plc (3.8% versus 2.2%)* LS: 4.6 [5.4]
Hip: 3.6 [4.2]
Lewiecki et al84 (one-year extension of study by McClung et al) 24 months Osteopenia or osteoporosis (T-score < −1.8) 412 (46) [47] Increased clinical (6.7% versus 2.2%) and osteoporotic (3.8% versus 0.0%) fractures in the sum of denosumab groups compared with plc* LS: 7.4 [8.6]
Hip: 5.1 [NR]
Miller et al85 (2-year extension of study by Lewiecki et al) 48 months Osteopenia or osteoporosis (T-score < −1.8) 412 (46) [231] No difference in clinical (10.5% versus 10.9%) and osteoporotic (7.0% versus 8.7%) fractures compared with plc* LS: 9.4–11.8 [11.8–14.2]
Hip: 4.0–6.1 [7.5–9.6]
Distal radius: 1.0–1.7 [5.7–6.4]
Miller et al14 (2-year extension of study by Miller et al in 2008) 72 months Osteopenia or osteoporosis (T-score < −1.8) 124 [124] 4.5% (no plc group for comparison)* LS: 13.3
Hip: 6.1
Distal radius: 1.9
Bone et al33 24 months Osteopenia or osteoporosis 332 (166) [166] Decreased vertebral (0% versus 0.6%) and nonvertebral (1% versus 4%) fractures compared with plc * LS: 6.5 [7.1]
Hip: 3.4 [4.5]
Distal radius: 1.4 [3.5]
Cummings et al31 (FREEDOM trial) 36 months Osteoporosis (T-score ≤ −2.5) 7868 (3906) [3902] New vertebral fractures: 2.3% versus 7.2% in the plc group (68% reduction, P < 0.0001)
[at 12 months 61%, at 24 months 78% reduction]
New nonvertebral fractures: 6.5% versus 8.0% in the plc group (20% reduction, P < 0.011)
Hip fractures: 0.7% versus 1.2% in the plc group (40% reduction, P < 0.036)
LS: NR [9.2 (8.2–10.1)]
Hip: NR [6.0 (5.2–6.7)]
Papapoulos et al30 (2-year extension of FREEDOM trial) 60 months Osteoporosis (T-score ≤ −2.5) 2343 [2343] New vertebral fractures: year incidence 1.4% versus 2.2% in the virtual plc
New nonvertebral fractures: year incidence 1.1% versus 2.6% in the virtual plc
LS: 13.7
Hip: 7.0
Distal radius: 2.3
Brown et al13 12 months Low bone mass (T-score ≤ −2) 1189 (594) [595] No difference in overall (4.0% versus 3.2%, P = 0.54) and osteoporotic (3.0% versus 2.2%, P = 0.37) fractures compared with alendronate* LS: 5.3
Hip: 3.5
Distal radius: 3.1

Note:

*

Fractures reported as adverse events (not as endpoints of the study).

Abbreviations: plc, placebo; NR, not reported; BMD, bone mineral density (measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry); LS, lumbar spine; hip, total hip.