Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 3.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011 Jan;81(1):128–138. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2010.01080.x

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Example of a bivariate dynamic latent difference score model examining the transactional relation between depressive symptoms and marital satisfaction.

Note. Sym and Sx= depressive symptoms. Sat and MS = marital satisfaction. ΔSymptoms (Satisfaction) 1 represents latent change score from Time 1 to Time 2 and ΔSymptoms (Satisfaction) 2 represents the latent change from Time 2 to Time 3; β represents a time-invariant proportional coefficient (i.e., proportion of previous score that predicts subsequent difference score), γ represents a time-invariant coupling parameter (i.e., proportion of score on another variable that predicts subsequent difference score). For identification purposes, α set to 1, which corresponds to linear systematic growth. Unlabeled one-headed arrow paths set to 1. Covariances between satisfaction and symptom error variances within the same time point (set equal across time) were estimated but not depicted in the figure.