Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 25;25(4):504–511. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9455-9

Table 2.

Error rate formulas and week-to-week comparison

Week 1 Week 2
Error rate Formula Reader 1 Reader 2 Total Reader 1 Reader 2 Total
Errors per report Total errors/total reports 200/219 = 0.91 550/223 = 2.47 750/442 = 1.7 356/350 = 1.02 906/381 = 2.38 1,262/731 = 1.73
Nongrammatical errors per report Total nongrammatical errors/total reports 122/219 = 0.56 113/223 = 0.51 235/442 = 0.53 227/350 = 0.65 211/381 = 0.55 438/731 = 0.60
Percentage of reports with errors ((Total reports − reports with no errors)/total reports) × 100% 46.6% 71.7% ((442 − 180)/442) × 100% = 59% 48.6% 70.7% ((731 − 292)/731) × 100% = 60%
Percentage of reports with nongrammatical errors (Total reports − Reports with no nongrammatical errors/Total reports) × 100% 31.5% 34.1% ((442 − 297)/442) × 100% = 33% 36.9% 35.2% ((731 − 468)/731) × 100% = 36%
Errors per dictated word Total errors/Total dictated words 0.013 0.028 729/34,641 = 0.02 0.012 0.036 1,229/54,515 = 0.02

Total errors: week 1 = 750, week 2 = 1,262; total nongrammatical errors: week 1 = 235, week 2 = 438; reports with no errors: week 1 = 180, week 2 = 292; reports with no nongrammatical errors: week 1 = 297, week 2 = 468; total reports: week 1 = 442, week 2 = 731; total dictated words: week 1 = 34,641, week 2 = 54,515

Prepopulated standardized reports were used during week 1. Prepopulated templates were disabled during week 2; however, radiologists could still choose to select a standard template manually