Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 4;21(7):1241–1249. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2057-2

Table 2.

Items contributing to the assessment process in general, rated as important by >70% of the participants

Clinical assessment of low back-related leg pain in primary care
Importance of each item rated according to its contribution to any of the following decisions:
 Establishing severity of symptoms
 Establishing need for investigations
 Establishing need for treatment/onwards referral
 Establishing the likely diagnosis
 Informing treatment
 Predicting prognosis
History items
 Items/questions Important (7–9 on scale)
 Domain: pain
  Area or distribution of pain in the leg 93.8% (n = 45)
  Progression of pain in the leg since onset of current episode (e.g. better/worse/same) 87.5% (n = 42)
  Severity of pain in the leg compared with severity of pain in the low back 85.4% (n = 41)
  Progression of LBP (e.g. better/worse/same) 83.3% (n = 35)
  Pain intensity in the leg 79.2% (n = 38)
  Aggravating and easing factors for the leg pain 77.1% (n = 37)
  Duration of symptoms in the leg 75% (n = 36)
  Response of leg pain to cough/sneeze/strain 73.8% (n = 31)
  Quality of pain in leg (e.g. burning, sharp, tingling, etc.) 73.8% (n = 31)
 Domain: symptoms other than pain
  Altered sensation in the leg (e.g. reporting of numbness and/or pins and needles, etc.) 83.3% (n = 40)
  Feeling of weakness in the leg 83.3% (n = 40)
 Domain: previous history
  Effect of previous self-management 81.0% (n = 34)
  Effect of previous treatment for similar symptoms 78.6% (n = 33)
  Previous history of similar leg pain 76.2% (n = 32)
 Domain: function
  Effect of leg pain on ability to work 83.3% (n = 40)
  Effect of leg pain on activities of daily living 83.3% (n = 40)
  Effect of back pain on activities of daily living 79.2% (n = 38)
  Effect of back pain on ability to work 79.2% (n = 38)
  Effect of leg pain on ability to do leisure activities/sports 71.4% (n = 30)
 Domain: psychosocial factors
  Assessment of patient’s perceptions and beliefs pertaining to their condition 91.7% (n = 44)
  Assessment of patient’s coping strategies 89.6% (n = 43)
  Assessment of patient’s distress 87.5% (n = 42)
  Assessment of patient’s fear and apprehension of movement 85.4% (n = 41)
  Assessment of patient’s future outlook 85.4% (n = 41)
  Assessment of patient’s mood 83.3% (n = 40)
  Assessment of effect of symptoms on family situation 79.2% (n = 38)
  Assessment of work issues 77.1% (n = 37)
Examination items
 Observation
  Muscle wasting 85.4% (n = 41)
 Spinal movements
  Demonstration of movement that produces symptoms 71.4% (n = 30)
 Neurological examination
  Assessment of muscle strength related to specific myotomes 89.6% (n = 43)
  Assessment of reflexes 83.3% (n = 40)
  SLR response on ‘well’ leg (cross-over pain) 83.3% (n = 35)
  Assessment of neural tension tests (SLR, femoral, slump) 77.1% (n = 37)
   Assessment of sensory appreciation 72.9% (n = 35)