Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Care. 2012 Apr 23;24(8):1028–1038. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.668285

Table 4.

Crosstabs of covariates with condom breakage/slippage and partial use among MSM Participating in a Nested Behavioral Study, Safe in the City

Total Partnerships (N=568) Breakage/Slippage P Total Partnerships (N=568) Partial Use P
Yes(N=46) No(N=522) Yes(N=88) No(N=480)
RESPONDENT CHARACTERISTICS
Site 0.4972 0.6560
 Denver 13 (9.7) 121 (90.3) 24 (17.9) 110 (82.1)
 Long Beach 9 (6.0) 141 (94.0) 23 (15.3) 127 (84.7)
 San Francisco 24 (8.5) 260 (91.5) 41 (14.4) 243 (85.6)

Arm 0.9870 0.6448
 Intervention 24 (8.1) 273 (91.9) 48 (16.2) 249 (83.8)
 Control 22 (8.1) 249 (91.9) 40 (14.8) 231 (85.2)

Race/Ethnicity 0.2635 0.0143
 White 25 (8.0) 288 (92.0) 40 (12.8) 273 (87.2)
 Black 2 (9.1) 20 (90.9) 2 (9.1) 20 (90.9)
 Hispanic 14 (11.6) 107 (88.4) 30 (24.8) 91 (75.2)
 Other 5 (4.5) 107 (95.5) 16 (14.3) 96 (95.7)

Education 0.0017 0.0008
 High school or less 11 (18.6) 48 (81.4) 18 (30.5) 41 (69.5)
 More than high school 35 (6.9) 474 (93.1) 70 (13.8) 439 (86.2)

Knowledge about condoms 0.0813 0.1731
 Yes 33 (7.1) 429 (92.9) 67 (14.5) 395 (85.5)
 No 13 (12.3) 93 (87.7) 21 (19.8) 85 (80.2)

Number of reported partners in the past 3 months 0.5448 0.3873
 1 6 (6.5) 86 (93.5) 17 (18.5) 75 (81.5)
 2 or more 40 (8.4) 436 (91.6) 71 (14.9) 405 (85.1)

STI in the past 3 months N=566 0.1453 <0.0001
 Yes or not known 0 (0.0) 23 (100.0) 11 (47.8) 12 (52.2)
 No 46 (8.5) 497 (91.5) 77 (14.2) 466 (85.8)

PARTNER CHARACTERISTICS
Partner number 0.2647 0.4054
 1 23 (7.0) 307 (93.0) 52 (15.8) 278 (84.2)
 2 23 (10.1) 205 (89.9) 33 (14.5) 195 (85.5)
 3 0 (0.0) 10 (100.0) 3 (30.0) 7 (70.0)

Perceived risk for partner STI N=568 0.0627 <0.0001
 Had STI or not known 19 (11.5) 147 (88.5) 43 (25.9) 123 (74.1)
 No STI 27 (6.8) 373 (93.2) 43 (10.8) 357 (89.2)

Perceived partner HIV status N=568 0.1032 0.2259
 HIV Positive or not known 13 (11.9) 96 (88.1) 21 (19.3) 88 (80.7)
 HIV Negative 33 (7.2) 426 (92.8) 67 (14.6) 392 (85.4)

Reported partner is the main partner 0.0185 0.1001
 Yes 6 (3.8) 153 (96.2) 31 (19.5) 128 (80.5)
 No 40 (9.8) 369 (90.2) 57 (13.9) 352 (86.1)

Partner had sex with others 0.5113 0.5149
 Yes or not known 32 (8.7) 338 (91.3) 60 (16.2) 310 (83.8)
 No 14 (7.1) 184 (92.9) 28 (14.1) 170 (85.9)

Partner-specific condom use efficacy (mean ± stdev) 3.2 ± 0.7 3.4 ± 0.8 0.1777 2.9 ± 0.9 3.4 ± 0.7 <0.0001

Perceived partner support for condom use (mean ± stdev) 3.0 ± 0.7 3.1 ± 0.7 0.1618 2.8 ± 0.8 3.2 ± 0.7 <0.0001

Had sex while either partner drunk or high 0.0086 0.0045
 Yes 24 (12.2) 172 (87.8) 42 (21.4) 154 (78.6)
 No 22 (5.9) 350 (94.1) 46 (12.4) 326 (87.6)

Study interval 0.4692 0.0125
 Baseline 26 (8.9) 266 (91.1) 56 (19.2) 236 (80.8)
 At 3 months 20 (7.3) 256 (92.7) 32 (11.6) 244 (88.4)

Condom use consistency 0.2879 <0.0001
 0%< use < 100% 12 (10.5) 102 (89.5) 40 (35.1) 74 (64.9)
 100% use 34 (7.5) 420 (92.5) 48 (10.6) 406 (89.4)

Type of sex act for the respondent 0.5097 0.4018
 Insertive “top” 29 (8.7) 303 (91.3) 55 (16.6) 277 (83.4)
 Receptive “bottom” 17 (7.2) 219 (92.8) 33 (14.0) 203 (86.0)

Number of acts with condom (mean ± stdev) 3.2 ± 3.7 2.9 ± 5.9 0.5990 3.9 ± 7.7 2.7 ± 5.3 0.1935

No condom use was reported in 422 (43%) of 990 total MSM partnerships.