Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Aug 11;52(1):2–15. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0176)

Table 4.

Regular past tense marking during elicitation probe: Higher probability versus lower probability verbs.

Group Higher probability
Lower probability
Standard Nonstandard Zero marked Other % Markeda Standard Nonstandard Zero marked Other % Marked
LSES 5.93b (1.34) 0 (−) 0.80 (1.37) 0.27 (0.59) 89% (19.62) 5.60 (1.06) 0 (−) 1.27 (0.96) 0.07 (0.26) 82% (13.70)
89 0 12 4 84 0 19 4
AM 6.73 (0.59) 0 (−) 0.20 (0.56) 0.07 (0.26) 97% (8.01) 6.07 (1.79) 0 (−) 0.60 (0.91) 0.07 (0.26) 88% (25.82)
101 0 3 25 91 0 9 1
LM 6.27 (1.67) 0 (−) 0.67 (1.45) 0 (−) 90% (23.29) 10.33 (4.15) 0 (−) 1.40 (1.50) 0 (−) 79% (22.74)
94 0 10 0 83 0 21 0
a

% Marked = calculated from (standard marked + nonstandard marked)/Total number of obligatory contexts (standard marked + nonstandard marked + zero marked).

b

The first row reflects the group average, the second reflects the standard deviation, and the third row, when given, reflects the sum of the responses.