Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 10;174(11):1316–1322. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr257

Table 3.

Interactions Between N-Acetyltransferase 2 Phenotype and Smoking History in Breast Cancer Risk, Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium, 1989–2006

Smoking History and NAT2 Phenotype Cases
Controls
Odds Ratioa 95% Confidence Interval P for Interactionb
Mean (SD) No. % Mean (SD) No. %
Duration of smoking (continuous), years 0.98
    Rapid + intermediate acetylators 23.9 (13.0) 23 (12.9) 1.01 1.00, 1.01
    Slow acetylators 24.0 (13.2) 23.2 (13.1) 1.01 1.00, 1.01
Pack-years of smoking (continuous) 0.87
    Rapid + intermediate acetylators 20.0 (18.0) 18.7 (17.2) 1.01 1.00, 1.01
    Slow acetylators 20.7 (19.1) 19.0 (17.3) 1.01 1.00, 1.01
Duration of smoking between menarche and first full-term pregnancy (continuous), years 0.03
    Rapid + intermediate acetylators 7.4 (7.7) 7.7 (8.1) 1.00 1.00, 1.00
    Slow acetylators 7.4 (7.7) 7.9 (8.6) 1.00 1.00, 1.00
Pack-years of smoking between menarche and first full-term pregnancy (continuous) 0.14
    Rapid + intermediate acetylators 5.4 (7.5) 5.3 (6.9) 1.01 1.00, 1.02
    Slow acetylators 5.5 (7.4) 5.6 (7.5) 1.00 1.00, 1.01
Duration of smoking (categorical), years 0.97
    Rapid + intermediate acetylators
        Never smoking 1,431 51.7 2,165 55.4 1 Reference
        ≤15 410 14.8 559 14.3 1.14 0.98, 1.32
        >15 927 33.5 1,182 30.3 1.17 1.04, 1.30
    Slow acetylators
        Never smoking 2,090 51.5 3,205 54.8 1 Reference
        ≤15 606 14.9 865 14.8 1.07 0.95, 1.21
        >15 1,362 33.6 1,775 30.4 1.18 1.07, 1.29
Pack-years of smoking (categorical) 0.87
    Rapid + intermediate acetylators
        Never smoking 1,431 52.7 2,163 56.5 1 Reference
        ≤20 772 28.4 1,045 27.3 1.13 1.01, 1.27
        >20 514 18.9 619 16.7 1.24 1.08, 1.42
    Slow acetylators
        Never smoking 2,090 52.8 3,205 56.1 1 Reference
        ≤20 1,108 28.0 1,571 27.5 1.08 0.92, 1.19
        >20 757 19.1 936 16.4 1.25 1.11, 1.39

Abbreviations: NAT2, N-acetyltransferase 2; SD, standard deviation.

a

Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, adjusted for age at baseline, body mass index at baseline, ever use of menopausal hormone therapy at baseline, parity, and cohort. For continuous variables, persons with no exposure comprised the reference category.

b

Interaction P values were tested using a multiplicative interaction term in the models.