Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Hered. 2012 Jan 18;73(1):47–51. doi: 10.1159/000334984

Table 1.

Sensitivity, specificity, type II error rate, type I error rate, missing values (NAs), total accuracy and area under ROC curve estimation for PolyPhen-2, SIFT and CAROL using an optimal threshold of 0.57, 0.96 and 0.98, respectively

PolyPhen-2 SIFT CAROL
Sensitivity 0.800 0.819 0.830
Specificity 0.705 0.727 0.727
Type II error 0.200 0.181 0.170
Type I error 0.295 0.273 0.273
NAs 0.116–0.125 0.004–0.177 0.001–0.072
Total accuracy 0.721 0.744 0.745
ROC area 0.836 0.821 0.852

Numbers in bold denote where CAROL performs better than the other 2 annotation tools.

Sensitivity equals the number of true positives divided by the number of true positives plus false negatives; Specificity equals the number of true negatives divided by the number of true negatives plus false positives; Type II error equals 1 – sensitivity; Type II error equals 1 – specificity; Total accuracy equals the number of true positives plus negatives divided by the number of total positives plus negatives; ROC area equals the value of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test statistic [as in ref. 32].