Table 1.
Sensitivity, specificity, type II error rate, type I error rate, missing values (NAs), total accuracy and area under ROC curve estimation for PolyPhen-2, SIFT and CAROL using an optimal threshold of 0.57, 0.96 and 0.98, respectively
PolyPhen-2 | SIFT | CAROL | |
---|---|---|---|
Sensitivity | 0.800 | 0.819 | 0.830 |
Specificity | 0.705 | 0.727 | 0.727 |
Type II error | 0.200 | 0.181 | 0.170 |
Type I error | 0.295 | 0.273 | 0.273 |
NAs | 0.116–0.125 | 0.004–0.177 | 0.001–0.072 |
Total accuracy | 0.721 | 0.744 | 0.745 |
ROC area | 0.836 | 0.821 | 0.852 |
Numbers in bold denote where CAROL performs better than the other 2 annotation tools.
Sensitivity equals the number of true positives divided by the number of true positives plus false negatives; Specificity equals the number of true negatives divided by the number of true negatives plus false positives; Type II error equals 1 – sensitivity; Type II error equals 1 – specificity; Total accuracy equals the number of true positives plus negatives divided by the number of total positives plus negatives; ROC area equals the value of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test statistic [as in ref. 32].