Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mem Lang. 2012 May 1;66(4):763–788. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.002

Table 5.

Estimates of the Dual-Retrieval Model’s Parameters for Experiments 3 and 4

Age and relatedness Recollection
Reconstruction
Familiarity judgment
D1f D2f R1f R2f J1f J2f

Experiment 3 (typical exemplars)
Adolescents:
 UU .71 .18 .17 .00 .64 .64
 CU .65 .07 .38 .00 .52 .86
 UC .78 .16 .61 .00 .51 .66
 CC .54 .16 .45 .28 .35 .75
Means .67 .14 .40 .07 .52 .73
Children:
 UU .64 .14 .36 .00 .44 .68
 CU .68 .11 .32 .00 .30 .69
 UC .74 .09 .42 .00 .52 .66
 CC .58 .06 .57 .00 .34 .94
Means .66 .10 .42 .00 .40 .75

Experiment 4 (atypical exemplars)

Adolescents:
 UU .78 .21 .22 .00 .62 .37
 CU .76 .01 .32 .00 .54 .86
 UC .78 .21 .34 .01 .50 .44
 CC .57 .17 .11 .00 .56 .23
Means .71 .17 .22 .00 .60 .48
Children:
 UU .59 .12 .40 .00 .71 .88
 CU .65 .08 .18 .00 .62 .78
 UC .79 .06 .50 .13 .52 .75
 CC .40 .09 .11 .00 .54 .81
Means .61 .09 .33 .03 .58 .81