Table 5.
Δ (Follow-up – baseline) among treatment group | Δ (Follow-up – baseline) among control group | |
---|---|---|
Ordinary binary outcomes | ||
Treats water by any recommended method | –19.3* (–23.1, –15.6) | –20.5* (–24.3, –16.7) |
Extracts water using ladle or tap | –2.8† (–5.4, –0.2) | –4.2* (–6.2, –2.1) |
Storage vessel has tight screw cap | 2.1 (–0.2, 4.5) | 0.5 (–1.5, 2.5) |
Categorical outcomes | Odds ratio: follow-up vs. baseline among treatments | Odds ratio: follow-up vs. baseline among controls |
Cleaning frequency: vessel used to fetch water (1 = daily; 5 = never) | 1.48* (1.09, 2.01) | 2.00* (1.51, 2.65) |
Cleaning frequency: vessel used to store water (1 = daily; 5 = never) | 1.22* (0.95, 1.58) | 1.46* (1.14, 1.87) |
Frequency of advanced filter usage (1 = daily; 5 = never) | 1.46* (1.07, 1.99) | 1.77* (1.27, 2.48) |
Number of occasions prompting hand washing (of five specific types of occasions) | 0.26* (0.23, 0.32) | 0.25* (0.21, 0.30) |
Significant with P < 0.05.
Significant with P < 0.1.
This table represents an alternative presentation of the DiD values reported in Table 4; results come from the same regressions as those results reported in Table 4. All coefficients and 95% CI limits (shown in parentheses) are multiplied by 100, and therefore, they represent marginal effects in percentage point terms.