Table 3.
Efficacy evaluation on Day 28 after PCR correction* ITT and PP analysis
AL (N = 665) | AS+AQ (N = 619) | AS+SP (N = 678) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Possible failure* – n (%) | 31 (4.7) | 18 (2.9) | 11 (1.6) | 0.005 |
ETF† – n (%) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 0.32 |
LCF† – n (%) | 2 (0.3) | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 0.43 |
LPF† – n (%) | 4 (0.6) | 6 (1.0) | 3 (0.4) | 0.5 |
ITT–ACPR – n (%) | 628 (94.4) | 593 (95.8) | 664 (97.9) | 0.004 |
PP–ACPR – n/N (%) | 628/634 (99.1) | 593/601 (98.7) | 664/667 (99.6) | 0.25 |
Reinfection rate – n/N (%) | 231/634 (36.4) | 117/601 (19.5) | 62/667 (9.3) | < 0.001 |
Possible failure: lost to follow-up or withdrawal or subjects for which filters were missing or undetermined PCR.
These are computed according to ITT analysis.
PCR = polymerase chain reaction; ITT = intention-to-treat; PP = per protocol; AL = artemether-lumefantrine; AS+AQ = artesunate plus amodiaquine; AS+SP = artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine; n/N = frequency; ETF = early treatment failure; LCF = late clinical failure; LPF = late parasitological failure; ACPR = adequate clinical and parasitological failure.