Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 1;87(1):50–56. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0649

Table 3.

Efficacy evaluation on Day 28 after PCR correction* ITT and PP analysis

AL (N = 665) AS+AQ (N = 619) AS+SP (N = 678) P value
Possible failure* – n (%) 31 (4.7) 18 (2.9) 11 (1.6) 0.005
ETF – n (%) 0 (0) 1 (0.2) 0 (0) 0.32
LCF – n (%) 2 (0.3) 1 (0.2) 0 (0) 0.43
LPF – n (%) 4 (0.6) 6 (1.0) 3 (0.4) 0.5
ITT–ACPR – n (%) 628 (94.4) 593 (95.8) 664 (97.9) 0.004
PP–ACPR – n/N (%) 628/634 (99.1) 593/601 (98.7) 664/667 (99.6) 0.25
Reinfection rate – n/N (%) 231/634 (36.4) 117/601 (19.5) 62/667 (9.3) < 0.001
*

Possible failure: lost to follow-up or withdrawal or subjects for which filters were missing or undetermined PCR.

These are computed according to ITT analysis.

PCR = polymerase chain reaction; ITT = intention-to-treat; PP = per protocol; AL = artemether-lumefantrine; AS+AQ = artesunate plus amodiaquine; AS+SP = artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine; n/N = frequency; ETF = early treatment failure; LCF = late clinical failure; LPF = late parasitological failure; ACPR = adequate clinical and parasitological failure.