Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 1;87(1):70–75. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0479

Table 1.

Frequency of IFN-γ-positive persons in response to Leishmania (Leish) antigens A, B, or C compared with LST-positive persons residing in areas of Iran endemic for ZCL, ACL, and ZVL and in a non-endemic area*

Area IFN-γ responder to Leish A (no. positive/no. tested) IFN-γ responder to Leish B (no. positive/no. tested) IFN-γ responder to Leish C (no. positive/no. tested) Frequency of LST-positive response (no. positive/no. tested) Magnitude of LST reactions (mean ± SD diameter, mm)
ZCL-1 45.5% (55/121) 43.8% (53/121) 100% (121/121) 15.55 ± 4.96
ZCL-2 46.7% (28/60) 50% (30/60)† 98.3% (59/60) 14.16 ± 4.60
ACL 33.7% (35/104) 36.5% (38/104) 94.4% (85/90) 15.10 ± 7.18
ZVL 53.7% (36/67) 58.2% (39/67) 70.2% (47/67) 8.84 ± 2.44
Non-endemic 9.8% (10/102) 13.7% (14/102) 0 0
*

IFN-γ = interferon-γ ZCL = zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis; ACL = anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis; ZVL = zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis.

A significant difference was observed between LST-positive persons and IFN-γ responders to antigens A, B, or C.