. 2012 May 16;20(4):363–380. doi: 10.1007/s10577-012-9281-4

Table 3.

Comparison of cytogenetic RMPs to RN-predicted, linkage, and physical RMPs

Bin	Locus	Arm^a	Relative map positions (%)				Deviation from pachytene FISH RMP^b
Bin	Locus	Arm^a	Cytogenetic FISH^c	Cytogenetic RN-predicted^d	Linkage UMC98^e	Genomic physical^f	Cytogenetic RN-predicted	Linkage UMC98	Genomic physical
CBM1.05	csu3	S	66^B73	58	28	39	8	38	27
CBM1.08	umc128a	L	64^B73	62	36	56	2	28	8
CBM1.10	umc107a (croc)	L	85^B73	85	60	78	0	25	7
CBM3.01	umc032a	S	96^{Seneca 60}	100	100	98	−4	−4	−2
CBM3.02	csu32a	S	92^{Seneca 60}	89	80	96	3	12	−4
CBM3.06	bnl5.37a	L	46^{Seneca 60}	43	17	53	3	29	−7
CBM3.09	umc63a	L	86^{Seneca 60}	90	72	88	−4	14	−2
4.05	agrr37b	S	51^B73	54	15	66	−3	36	−15
CBM4.08	umc127c	L	62^B73	66	40	54	−4	22	8
CBM4.09	umc52a	L	84^B73	84	60	71	0	24	13
CBM5.02	umc90	S	89^B73	87	61	92	2	28	−3
CBM5.04	bnl4.36	S	35^B73	32	7	24	2	27	10
5.05	csu93b	L	40^B73	40	10	59	0	30	−19
CBM5.06	umc126	L	60^B73	69	34	76	−9	26	−16
CBM5.08	bnl524a	L	90^B73	91	74	94	−1	16	−4
6.02	umc59a	L	25^Mo17	23	6	9	2	19	16
CBM6.03	npi393	L	38^M017	37	15	35	1	23	3
CBM6.05	umc21	L	64^Mo17	67	40	60	−3	24	4
CBM6.07	umc132a (chk)	L	88^Mo17	90	73	93	−2	15	−5
CBM8.01	npi220a	S	98^B73	100	100	96	−2	−2	2
CBM8.03	umc124a (chk)	S	16^B73	17	14	56	−1	2	−40
8.04	csu204 (uce)	L	70^B73	69e	31	54	1	39	16
CBM8.08	npi414a	L	93^B73	91	75	95	2	18	−2
Duplicate bin
6.04	csu95d	L	50^Mo17	64.5–65.4	–	–	−15
1.05	csu694b (uce)	S	44^B73	58	27	19	−14	17	25
1.03	csu59b	S	78^B73	71–73	–	–	6
1.02	csu145c (pck)	S	85^B73	80–81	–	74	5		11

^aChromosome arm on which locus resides, long (L) or short (S)

^b(FISH RMP) − (comparative map RMP)

^ccMc, as RMPs with the maize inbred line chromosome source in OMA line indicated in superscript

^dBy Anderson et al. (2004) except for markers csu95d (pl1 and umc248), csu59b (P1 and umc66), and csu145c (csu315c and umc11a), whose values were predicted by means of the Morgan2McClintock Translator with closest flanking markers on the umc98 map

^eRMP calculated from Anderson et al. (2003) RN data as published by the Morgan2McClintock Translator with umc98 linkage map cM values, Maize Version 2.0 (v1.0; Lawrence et al. 2006)

^fPhysical RMPs from Supplemental Table 2 determined as described in Supplemental Fig. 1