Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Apr 17;20(8):869–879. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.005

Table 1.

Re-measurement error (precision) for cartilage volume (VC) from unpaired analyses represented as RMSE CV%, for each cartilage plate, analysis team and acquisition for (A) medial and lateral tibia, (B) medial and lateral central femur. The combined (pooled data) RMSE CV% for a plate and acquisition combination were computed with and without the results from outlier teams. Metrics where a significant team effect on precision was observed had outlier teams identified by results that differed significantly from at least 2 other teams in pair-wise comparisons. Two isolated test-retest pair outliers for VC were excluded (values in parentheses) from MT analyses of all three acquisitions and from LT analyses of FLASH.

(A) Medial and Lateral Tibia (MT and LT) cartilage volume (VC)
MT LT
Analysis
Team
FLASH DESS-
MPR
DESS FLASH DESS-
MPR
DESS
A 5.3% 8.0% 14.0% (6.9%) 4.6% 4.8% 10.1%
B 3.5% 4.5% 4.2% 4.1% 3.5% 4.7%
C 4.0% 3.1% 3.6% 6.1% 4.3% 8.6%
E 11.2% (6.2%) 14.6% (9.6%) 4.9% 11.9% (4.8%) 19.2% 6.3%
Pooled, without isolated outlier data points 4.6% (0.56) 6.2% (0.06) 4.9% (0.63) 4.9% (0.7) - -
Pooled, without outlier team - 5.1% 1 - - 4.1% 2 -
Pooled (p-value for team effect) [RMSE mm3] 5.9% (0.38) [114.7] 7.9% (0.027) [150.1] 7.0% (0.73) [151.6] 6.9% (0.60) [144.5] 9.5% (0.002) [196.3] 7.4% (0.19) [169.8]
(B) Central Medial and Lateral Femur (cMF and cLF) cartilage volume (VC)
cMF cLF
Analysis
Team
FLASH DESS-
MPR
DESS FLASH DESS-
MPR
DESS
A -- 8.7% -- -- 9.5% --
B 4.8% 4.3% 6.8% 6.0% 6.2% 5.4%
C 6.7% 5.8% 6.5% 5.6% 4.9% 6.7%
D 5.1% 5.8% 3.5% 4.8% 4.0% 3.8%
E 9.1% 7.2% 4.6% 8.1% 11.1% 11.7%
Pooled, without outlier team - 4.1% 3 - - 6.0% 4 -
Pooled (p-value for team effect) [RMSE mm3] 6.8% (0.09) [79.0] 6.4% (0.05) [72.3] 5.5% (0.03) [65.4] 6.4% (0.98) [78.8] 7.7% (0.01) [86.0] 7.7% (0.63) [89.3]
1

Team B and C differ (p<0.05) from E; after outlier data point removal B–E=0.11 and C–E=0.008.

2

Team A, B and C differ (p<0.05) from E; after outlier data point removal A–E=0.02, B–E=0.0002, and C–E=0.02.

3

Team B and C differ (p<0.05) from E; after outlier data point removal B–E=0.004 and C–E=0.047.

4

Team A, B, C and D differ (p<0.05) from E; after outlier data point removal A–E=0.003, B–E=0.002, C–E=0.03, and D–E=0.004.