. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 8.

Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2011 May 26;22(7):908–915. doi: 10.1177/0956797611410573

Table 4.

Commitment: Predicting Dyadic Hostility

		B	S EB	β	R²
Step 1					.18
	Weak-link partner’s score	−.51	.34	−.24
	Strong-link partner’s score	−.24	.40	−.09
	Sex of weak-link partner	.49^*	.18	.30^*
Step 2					.17
	Weak-link partner’s score	−.38	.47	−.17
	Strong-link partner’s score	−.34	.47	−.13
	Sex of weak-link partner	.49^*	.19	.30^*
	Discrepancy of commitment	.26	.63	.06
Step 3					.20
	Weak-link partner’s score	−.29	.47	−.13
	Strong-link partner’s score	−.19	.47	−.07
	Sex of weak-link partner	.52^**	.18	.32^**
	Discrepancy of commitment	−.20	.66	−.05
	Less committed X Discrepancy	−1.16^†	.63	−.25^†

Note: N= 69

^†

p < .06

p < .05

^**

p < .01