Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Behav Med. 2012 Feb;43(1):4–14. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9334-5

Table 5.

Sex-specific mean differences in VAT and SAT adipose tissue volumes by categories of coping behaviors in response to lifetime discrimination by sex (n = 2,080): Jackson Heart Study, Jackson, MS

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5
Visceral adipose tissue (cm3)
Men Passive coping 78.5±32.0* 76.5±32.2* 74.5±32.1* 59.8±28.0* 60.6±28.0*
Mixed coping 77.7±50.0 78.2±49.8 79.0±49.6 63.2±43.2 62.6±43.2
Other coping 38.0±84.7 41.4±84.6 30.9±84.4 72.6±73.6 73.0±73.5
Subcutaneous adipose tissue (cm3)
Men Passive coping 62.3±64.2 59.1±64.8 51.5±64.5 5.2±41.0 7.6±41.0
Mixed coping −69.9±100.3 −69.8±100.3 −66.0±99.6 −116.0±63.2 −117.7±63.2
Other coping −147.0±170.0 −150.1±170.3 −136.9±170.5 −5.3±107.7 −4.3±107.6

Model 1 adjusts for age and menopausal/hormonal status and reproductive history (in women). Model 2 adds educational attainment and annual household income to model 1. Model 3 adjusts for variables in model 2 and for cigarette smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, energy, and percent energy from total fat. Model 4 adjusts for variables in model 3 and for body mass index. Model 5 adds major life events

Reference group: Since passive coping responses have been shown to be associated with a higher risk of adiposity in prior work [21], participants who responded with an active coping behavior served as the referent group

Women: n = 1,298; men: n = 782

p<0.10;

*

p<0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001