. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 8.

Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2010 Oct 30;40(3):296–309. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9598-2

Table 2.

Model comparison

	χ²	p	RMSEA	CFI	Model comparison test
	χ²	p	RMSEA	CFI	Δdf	Δχ²	p-value
Males
Model 1: Fully recursive model	0.072	0.79	0.00	1.000
Model 2: Reduced model	2.166	0.71	0.00	1.000
Model 1 versus Model 2					3	2.094	0.55
Females
Model 1: Fully recursive model	0.015	0.90	0.00	1.000
Model 2: Reduced model	0.327	0.85	0.00	1.000
Model 1 versus model 2					1	0.312	0.58