Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov 4;58(12):2401–2406. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03162.x

Table 2.

Effects of Dimensions of the Practice Environment on Quality Outcomes

Adverse Event and Practice Environment Dimension Standardized β Coefficient of Determination F
Percentage of pressure ulcers
    Total composite score – 0.37** 0.13 8.50
    Quality foundations – 0.38** 0.14 9.13
    Resource adequacy – 0.35** 0.12 7.67
    Participation in facility affairs – 0.31* 0.10 6.02
    Registered nurse–physician relationships – 0.28* 0.08 4.72
    Supportive manager – 0.24 0.06 4.21
Deficiencies
    Total composite score – 044*** 0.20 15.00
    Quality foundations – 0.36** 0.13 9.00
    Resource adequacy – 0.43*** 0.19 13.90
    Participation in facility affairs – 0.38** 0.10 6.00
    Registered nurse–physician relationships – 0.32* 0.10 6.95
    Supportive manager – 0.37** 0.14 9.71

Note: Scores indicate extent to which respondents agree that supportive traits are present (range 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating more-supportive environments).

*

P < .05

**

P < .01.