Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 9.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):988–1000. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0273-4

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Correspondence of individual face ratings with the consensus ratings. For each of 10 raters (5 M, 5 F), boxplots indicate the distribution of consensus ratings for the images that the rater scored at each level of face-likeness, from 1 (least face-like) to 4 (most face-like). Consensus ratings for each image were determined by missing-data principal components analysis (see the Method section)