Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 May 7;21(7):1012–1018. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0207

Table 1.

Studies describing clinical correlates of PAX3- and/or PAX7-FOXO1 translocations among patients with RMS

Clinical Characteristics
Assessed
Study Total N, by
histology
Total N, by
translocation
status
Age Gender Primary
Site
Tumor Size Metastatic
Disease
IRS Group Survival
Status
Worse
Prognostic
Marker
Main Findings
Kelly
(1997)
Ref #15
27 ARMS
3 ERMS
4 Other
18 PAX3
16 PAX7
0 F−
PAX3-
FOXO1
Four-yr EFS for patients with PAX3-FOXO1 was 17% v. 43% for those with
PAX7-FOXO1 (p=0.04). Patients with PAX3-FOXO1 translocation tended to
be older (median 13 v. 6 yrs, p=0.01), have primary extremity lesions (82% v.
22%, p=0.001) or metastatic disease (44% v. 19%, p=0.03).
Anderson
(2001)
Ref #16
38 ARMS
43 ERMS
10 OTHER
37 PAX3
8 PAX7
46 F−
PAX3-
FOXO1
Four-yr EFS for patients with PAX3-FOXO1 was inferior (20% v. 70%,
p<0.0001).Patients with PAX3-FOXO1 translocation tended to be older
(median age 9 v. 3 yrs, p=0.001), have higher stage disease (63% v. 38%
stage 3-4, p=0.006).
Sorensen
(2002)
Ref # 7
78 ARMS
69 ERMS
24 Other
43 PAX3
17 PAX7
111 F−
PAX3-
FOXO1
(only if
metastatic
disease)
PAX3-FOXO1 and PAX7-FOXO1 fusion transcripts were detected in 55%
and 22% of alveolar RMS patients, respectively; 23% were fusion-negative.
All other RMS patients lack transcripts. Fusion status was not associated with
outcome differences in ARMS patients with localized disease; however,
among those with metastatic disease, PAX3-FOXO1 was associated with
inferior overall survival (8% v. 75%, p=0.0015). Fusion negative status
suggested an intermediate risk: relative risk of relapse 11.5 (95% CI 5.1-25.6)
for PAX3-FOXO1, 4.9 (1.4-17.3) for F− and 1.3 (0.2-10.2) for PAX7 patients,
respectively.
Barr
(2006)
Ref #17
59 ARMS 35 PAX3
11 PAX7
13 F−
Neither No differences in FFS between groups; however, patients who had available
fusion data for analysis had superior 5-yr FFS (75% v. 45%, p=-.0015).
Neither translocation was associated with FFS or OS in multivariate models.
Williamson
(2010)
Ref #8
133 ARMS
77 ERMS
94 F+
39F−
Any F+ ERMS patients were not assessed for fusion status. ARMS F+ patients had
inferior 5-yr EFS compared to ARMS F− and ERMS patients (20% v. 60% v.
55%, respectively, p<0.001). The relative risk of death for F+ RMS patients
was 2.5 after adjustment for stage and histology (95% CI 1.2-5.1). ARMS F+
patients were more likely to have unfavorable sites of disease (79% v. 53% v.
57%, respectively, p=0.002) and metastatic disease (43% v. 8% v. 12%,
respectively, p<0.001).
Stegmaier
(2011)
Ref #18
121 ARMS 72 PAX3
29 PAX7
20 F−
Neither Patients with PAX3-FOXO1 translocation tended to be older than those with
PAX7-FOXO1 (63% v. 17% older than 10 yrs, p=0.0001) and have higher
rates of metastatic disease (50% v. 24%, p=0.017). There was no difference
in EFS between patients in the two groups. 5-yr EFS for PAX3-FOXO1 3
was 38.9% v. 18.2% for PAX7-FOXO1 (p=0.235). Compared to non-
analyzed, historical controls, localized patients who had fusion data for
analysis had inferior EFS (29% v. 51%, p=0.009), regardless of fusion status.
Dumont
(2011)
Ref #9
31 ARMS
62 ERMS
12 Other
14 PAX3
4 PAX7
34 F−
Neither Fifty-two percent of samples identified any fusion status (+ or −). Patients with
ARMS and either translocation were more likely to have metastatic disease
(39%) compared to fusion-negative ARMS or ERMS patients (both 22%,
p=0.0081). No associations were detected between fusion transcripts and
survival.

RMS: Rhabdomyosarcoma; IRS Group: Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group post-surgical stage; ARMS: Alveolar RMS; ERMS: Embryonal RMS; F−: Fusion-negative patients; EFS: Event-Free Survival; F+: Fusion-positive (either PAX3- or PAX7-FOXO1)