Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 10.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2010 Sep;119(9):594–601. doi: 10.1177/000348941011900905

Table 2.

Student's t-tests for POST vs. PRE conditions of non-sEMG parameters (one-tailed, paired, N=13)

Parameter PRE POST Difference p-value
Strain 54.5 (23.0) 26.5 (21.3) −28.0 (24.5) 0.001
/a/ Rise Time (ms) 112 (45) 111 (77) −1 (89) 0.508
/i/ Rise Time (ms) 95 (27) 96 (33) 1 (41) 0.467
AP rating 2.4 (1.1) 2.1 (1.0) −0.3 (0.7) 0.060
FVF rating 3.5 (0.8) 2.8 (0.9) −0.7 (1.1) 0.020
AP quantitative 0.53 (0.41) 0.48 (0.22) −0.05 (0.23) 0.212
FVF quantitative 3.92 (7.01) 3.65 (7.01) −0.27 (0.64) 0.076
Airflow C (L/s) 0.36 (0.19) 0.23 (0.09) −0.13 (0.19) 0.014
Airflow L (L/s) 0.53 (0.23) 0.30 (0.14) −0.24 (0.30) 0.008

PRE = mean (standard deviation) pre-injection, POST = mean (standard deviation) post-injection, Difference = mean POST − PRE, C = comfortable, L = loud, AP = anterior-posterior, FVF = false vocal fold, p-values shown in bold indicate parameters found to be statistically significantly different POST relative to PRE at a p < 0.05 level.