Table 2.
Scenario | ROC AUC | Average accuracy | ||||||
SW | EN | LL | BOSS | SW | EN | LL | BOSS | |
A90 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.85 |
A70 | 0.78 | 0.82* | 0.82* | 0.82 | 0.59 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 0.70 |
A50 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.57 |
B90 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.60 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.80 |
B70 | 0.70 | 0.77* | 0.78* | 0.77 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.64 |
B50 | 0.64 | 0.68* | 0.67* | 0.68 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.56 |
Except where indicated (*), BOSS improved on the three reference methods (p<0.05, one-sided paired t test).
EN, elastic net; LL, logistic lasso; ROC AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic; SW, stepwise regression.