Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 10.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Jul;165(7):653–658. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.92

Table 4.

Proportion of Infants With and Without DPa Scoring in the “Delayed” Range (Standard Score <85) Relative to BSID-III Norms

BSID-III Domain Delayed (Standard
Score <85), %
Adjusted
Relative Risk
(95% CI)b

Children
With DP
Children
Without DP
Time 2 differences
    Cognitivec 8.3 0.6 13.8 (1.8–105.5)
    Languagec 18.5 6.1 3.9 (1.6–6.2)
    Motorc 6.0 1.8 3.2 (1.1–13.1)
    Adaptive behaviord 11.0 6.1 1.8 (0.9–3.8)

Abbreviations: See Table 3.

a

Standard scores for the cognitive, language, motor, and adaptive behavior composite scales have a normative mean (SD) of 100 (15). Scaled scores for the receptive language, expressive language, fine motor, and gross motor subscales have a normative mean (SD) of 10 (3).

b

Data were dropped for 2 children in the DP group who did not have evidence of DP based on physician ratings of 3-dimensional head photographs and 69 children in the non-DP group who had mild or greater posterior skull flattening or asymmetry. Data were also excluded for 7 children with DP and 2 without DP who were diagnosed as having medical conditions with developmental implications after study enrollment.

c

Scores rated as invalid by the examiner were excluded from analyses. At time 2, cognitive scores were rated as invalid for 1 child with DP, language scores were rated as invalid for 2 children with DP, and motor scores were rated as invalid for 2 children with DP.

d

Adaptive behavior data were missing for 23 children with DP and 13 without DP at time 2. Another 2 children with DP and 2 without DP were not seen for a clinic assessment, and only parent-reported adaptive behavior data were available.