Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul;56(7):3996–3998. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05628-11

Table 1.

MICs of selected antibioticsa for isolate 2688 (Acinetobacter pitti), E. coli Top10 plus pBSCK, and E. coli Top10 plus pBSCK-OXA-72

Strain MIC (μg/ml)f
IPM MEM DORb FEP CAZ CTX CRO ATMc TZP CSLd AMK TGCe PMB CIP
A. pittii 2688 32 (R) >64 (R) >64 (R) 4 (S) 4 (S) 16 (I) 16 (I) 32 (R) 128/4 (R) ≤8/4 (S) ≤8 (S) ≤0.12 (S) 1 (S) ≤0.5 (S)
E. coli Top10 plus pBSCKh 0.125g 0.012g 0.012g 0.032g ≤1 ≤1 ≤1 ≤2 ≤8/4 ≤8/4 ≤8 ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5
E. coli Top10 plus pBSCK-OXA-72h 0.75g 0.032g 0.047g 0.094g ≤1 ≤1 ≤1 ≤2 ≤8/4 ≤8/4 ≤8 ≤0.5 ≤0.5 ≤0.5
a

IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; DOR, doripenem; FEP, cefepime; CAZ, ceftazidime; CTX, cefotaxime; CRO, ceftriaxone; ATM, aztreonam; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; CSL, cefoperazone-sulbactam; AMK, amikacin; TGC, tigecycline; PMB, polymyxin B; CIP, ciprofloxacin.

b

MICs according to EUCAST breakpoints (7).

c

MICs according to CLSI guidelines for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5).

d

MICs according to Jones et al. (10).

e

MICs according to BSAC criteria (3).

f

Letters in parentheses indicate interpretation of MICs: R, resistant; I, intermediate; S, susceptible.

g

MIC values determined by Etest.

h

Organism was susceptible to all antibiotics tested.