Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul;56(7):3936–3942. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05419-11

Table 2.

Types of antimicrobial therapy and impacts on outcome

Treatment and outcome (no. of patients) No. (%) of patients with outcome:
Pa ORa 95% CIa
Present Absent
Empirical therapy
    Cefepime alone (43)
        Mortality 17 (40) 26 (60.5) 0.7 1.19 0.57–2.49
        Readmission 13 (30) 30 (70) 0.8 1.14 0.52–2.50
    Cefepime alone or in combination (69)
        Mortality 26 (38) 43 (62.3) 0.86 1.09 0.55–2.15
        Readmission 17 (25) 52 (75.4) 0.3 0.70 0.34–1.47
    Carbapenem alone (14)
        Mortality 5 (36) 9 (64.3) 1.0 0.96 0.30–3.03
        Readmission 2 (14.3) 12 (86) 0.3 0.39 0.08–1.83
    Carbapenem alone or in combination (40)
        Mortality 15 (38) 25 (63) 1.0 1.05 0.49–2.24
        Readmission 7 (17.5) 33 (80.5) 0.09 0.44 0.17–1.13
Consolidative Therapy
    Cefepime alone (9)
        Mortality 3 (33.3) 6 (67) 1.00 0.86 0.20– 3.59
        Readmission 5 (56) 4 (44) 0.12 3.47 0.88–13.64
    Cefepime alone or in combination (31)
        Mortality 9 (29) 22 (71) 0.40 0.65 0.27–1.54
        Readmission 9 (29) 22 (71) 1.00 1.04 0.43–2.5
    Carbapenem alone (33)
        Mortality 12 (36.4) 21 (64) 1.00 0.98 0.44–2.21
        Readmission 9 (27) 24 (73) 1.00 0.93 0.39–2.23
    Carbapenem alone or in combination (78)
        Mortality 25 (32) 53 (68) 0.23 0.65 0.33–1.29
        Readmission 21 (27) 57 (73) 0.71 0.86 0.41–1.78
a

These analyses were conducted by comparing patients who had the antibiotic exposure variable to patients who did not have the antibiotic exposure variable.