Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Artif Intell Med. 2012 Jun 5;55(3):197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.05.002

Table 1.

Independent test results by classifier, feature type, and citation portion: ameloblastoma dataa

Recall
(%)
Precision
(%)
F3
(%)
Recall
(%)
Precision
(%)
F3
(%)
Recall
(%)
Precision
(%)
F3
(%)
BOW / FULL BOW / TIABS BOW / TITLES

1-NN 69.23 57.45 67.84 64.10 60.98 63.77 46.15 45.00 46.03
NB 10.26 80.00 11.24 15.38 54.55 16.57 56.41 37.93 53.79
cNB 25.64 76.92 27.47 35.90 63.64 37.54 66.67 22.22 55.56
EvoSVM 82.05 20.51 63.11 64.10 18.66 51.55 71.79 18.30 55.55

2G / FULL 2G / TIABS 2G / TITLES

1-NN 61.54 60.00 61.38 64.10 58.14 63.45 35.90 35.90 35.90
NB 7.69 100.00 8.47 10.26 100.00 11.27 38.46 39.47 38.56
cNB 10.26 100.00 11.27 17.95 87.50 19.50 69.23 30.68 61.50
EvoSVM 66.67 40.00 62.50 51.28 46.51 50.79 64.10 25.00 55.43

3G / FULL 3G / TIABS 3G / TITLES

1-NN 61.54 63.16 61.70 64.10 62.50 63.94 28.21 28.95 28.28
NB 17.95 100.00 19.55 12.82 100.00 14.04 66.67 24.53 56.90
cNB 7.69 100.00 8.47 15.38 100.00 16.80 53.85 28.00 49.30
EvoSVM 64.10 48.08 62.03 48.72 55.88 49.35 69.23 19.29 54.99
a

BOW=bag of words; 2G=2-term n-grams; 3G=3-term n-grams; FULL=title, abstract, metadata; TIABS=title, abstract; 1-NN=1 nearest neighbor; NB=naïve Bayes; cNB=complement naïve Bayes; EvoSVM=evolutionary support vector machine