Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 13;74(1):161–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04169.x

Table 3.

Hazard ratio for major adverse cardiovascular events* comparing clopidogrel use with non-use, with and without concomitant use of statins

Clopidogrel use
Number Rates
+ + Unadjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) Interaction effect (95% CI) P§ Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) Interaction effect (95% CI) P§
Overall†† 838 231 446 130 0.32 (0.28, 0.38) 0.34 (0.29, 0.40)
+ 237 584 108 104 0.66 (0.56, 0.77) 2.03 (1.64, 2.51) <0.0001 0.68 (0.58, 0.79) 1.97 (1.59, 2.44) <0.0001
Simvastatin 881 292 395 130 0.35 (0.30, 0.40) 0.34 (0.30, 0.39)
+ 194 523 105 101 0.65 (0.55, 0.78) 1.87 (1.51, 2.32) <0.0001 0.66 (0.56, 0.79) 1.95 (1.57, 2.41) <0.0001
Atorvastatin 1031 755 277 109 0.38 (0.34, 0.42) 0.38 (0.34, 0.43)
+ 44 60 124 126 0.64 (0.43, 0.95) 1.68 (1.13, 2.51) 0.0110 0.63 (0.43, 0.93) 1.65 (1.10, 2.46) 0.01
*

Composite of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization and cardiac death.

Numbers reflect exposure status at time of outcome. Rates are number of events per 1000 person years.

The ratio of the stratum-specific hazard ratios, which estimates the relative hazard rate increase associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and statins, beyond that expected from the independent effects of these drugs alone.

§

Wald χ2 test for no interaction in the model.

Adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, obesity and time-varying use of aspirin, calcium channel blockers and proton pump inhibitors.

††

Current use of simvastatin, lovastatin or atorvastatin.