Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 9;40(Web Server issue):W147–W151. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks553

Table 1.

Sensitivity (a), specificity (b) and PPV (c) of the prediction of different data sets by varying the filtering conditions

Data set 90% identity
70% identity
30% identity
eggNOG
All Dom GO COG All Dom GO COG All Dom GO COG All
Arabidopsis (a) 17% 3% 8% 7% 31% 5% 16% 13% 53% 8% 25% 21% 32%
Yeast (a) 13% 0% 4% 6% 17% 0% 5% 6% 30% 1% 10% 14% 33%
Human (a) 11% 1% 5% 4% 23% 2% 10% 8% 42% 4% 17% 15% 28%
Mouse (a) 17% 1% 6% 8% 36% 2% 12% 14% 59% 3% 18% 20% 27%
Drosophila (a) 4% 0% 1% 0% 5% 0% 1% 1% 10% 1% 2% 2% 8%
Worm (a) 1% 0% 0% 0% 4% 1% 2% 1% 12% 2% 6% 4% 11%
Negatome (b) 92% 98% 95% 97% 88% 97% 91% 96% 72% 92% 78% 97% 77%
Arabidopsis (c)(d) 1.27% 4.92% 2.33% 1.67% 0.56% 4% 1.23% 0.63% 0.07% 0.56% 0.17% 0.06% 0.03%

The percentage indicates sensitivity (a), specificity (b) or PPV (c). (d) Main screen data set from the Arabidopsis interactome map for 8 596 Arabidopsis proteins, with a precision of 80% and a sensitivity of 16% (38). All, all predictions without applying any restriction; Dom, predictions filtered by known interacting domains reported in 3DID or iPfam; GO, predictions filtered by GO term similarity (biological process or cellular compartment); COG, predictions filtered by known interacting proteins in the same clusters of orthologous groups. Clusters of orthologous genes were as defined in the eggNOG database excluding non-supervised clusters.