Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 21;110(2):281–290. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs055

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Induction of plant defence responses against compatible and incompatible pathovars of Xanthomonas axonopodis and defence priming of resistance genes by aphid infestation. (A) Induction of plant resistance against a compatible X. axonopodis pv. vesicatoria (Xav). Disease severity was measured 7 d after Xav challenge, on a scale of 1–5. (B) Induction of plant resistance against an incompatible X. axonopodis pv. glycines (Xag). The hypersensitive response (HR) index was measured 48 h after Xag inoculation, on a scale of 1–5. Values are means ± s.e.m., sample size n = 10 plants per treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (P = 0·05), according to the least-significant difference (LSD) test. (C) Real-time qRT-PCR analysis of the expression levels of marker genes for SA (CaPR9), JA (CaLOX1) and ET (CaCHI2) in aphid, 0·5 mm BTH, aphid + BTH and water control at 0 and 6 h post-inoculation (hpi). The housekeeping gene CaActin was used as a control. Values are means ± s.e.m. The experiment was repeated four times with similar results.