Table 1.
Molecular alteration | Clinical significance | REMARK recommendations* | Status† |
---|---|---|---|
mRNA based (gene signatures)¶ | |||
Poor-survival signature (186 genes)12Φ | Poor survival | OK | EV |
EpCAM signature22 | Poor survival | OK | EV |
Venous metastasis signature38 | Hepatic metastasis | OK | EV |
Class A20 / Hepatoblast signature21 | Poor survival | OK | IV, EV |
G3 subclass19 | Poor survival | - | IV, EV |
miRNA-based | |||
Down-regulation miR-26a26 | Poor survival | OK | EV |
20-miRNA signature31 | Venous metastasis, overall survival |
OK | EV |
Down-regulation miR-12224 | Poor survival | - | IV, EV |
Down-regulation Let-7 members25 | Early recurrence | - | IV, EV |
Up-regulation miR-125a27 | Better survival | - | IV, EV |
19-miRNA signature30 | Poor survival | - | IV, EV |
Up-regulation miR-22128 | Multinodularity; reduced time to recurrence |
- | T, IV, EV |
Up-regulation miR-92, miR-20, miR-1829 | Poor differentiation | - | T, IV, EV |
Epigenetics | |||
Genome wide hypomethylation32 | Tumor Progression, Survival | - | IV, EV |
Hypermethilation of E-cadherin or GSTP135 | Poor survival | - | IV, EV |
Degree of hypomethylation33 | Advanced histological grade; larger tumor size |
- | T, IV, EV |
264-gene hypermethylation profile34 | Moderately/poor differentiated tumors |
- | T, IV, EV |
Hypermethilation of E-cadherin36 | Microvascular invasion; tumor recurrence |
- | T, IV, EV |
Hypermethilation of RIZ137 | Correlation with disease-free survival |
- | T, IV, EV |
Reasonable compliance with REMARK recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies44
Current status in terms of clinical implementation (T: need further preliminary prognostic evaluation, IV: lacks internal validation, EV: lacks external validation)
Molecular classifications (mRNA-based) with prognostic impact are thoroughly discussed elsewhere8,9,17
Genomic signature obtained from early HCC