Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Dec;6(4):3–20. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.3

TABLE 6.

“How would you feel if the reason researchers wanted to contact you about being in a new study was because of something they learned about your DNA in the first study?”

Response Theme Examples
Positive Sign of scientific advancement
  • I think that’d be great … you would know that the other study worked. (CF-C16)

  • That’s fine. I mean, DNA, that sounds like it could be moving, progressing somewhere. Yeah, that would be good. (Epilepsy-D06)

  • I would be very happy about that. I mean I would say, “Yay, I’m helping make a difference finding something.” (Autism, SAGE-S23)


Facilitate more research
  • It’s always good to learn new things about genetics and DNA. So I think it’d be great to learn new stuff and do more research based on what’s been learned. That’s the whole point of doing research. (CF-C17)

  • Oh, I’m fine with that … if they found, let’s say, we have a predisposition to autism on gene chromosome number 8 or whatever, I’d be fine like if they took all the people they thought that had this … and did another study. I think that’s great. (Autism, AGRE-S02)


Positive, would want results Would want to know what researchers had learned
  • If there was something they learned about my DNA, and they want to look into it further, I would understand the value of that. I would have no problems with that. I mean for obvious reasons I might be a little anxious if there was something that they found out. I would want to know what it is. (Biobank-C11)

  • That would be fine, although I’d wanna know probably what they see that makes them want to look at my DNA. (Epilepsy-D05)


Inform participation decision
  • I’d be willing if it’s something that was in my DNA the first time or genetics, it’s good for me to be informed of that and that’s why I would be willing to further the study. (Epilepsy-D17)


Positive, with some reservations Advance notice
  • Being up front in the beginning is the key to it. If I agree to something ahead of time, I know they’re doing it. If I assume that I’m an anonymous donor, and then later on I find out I’m not, then I feel betrayed I guess is the right term for it. (Biobank-C10)


Confidentiality
  • I guess it would depend on if they were a part of the study that they had learned that from. Like if they were just kind of a third party researcher and they learned it through like friends or like seeing the results or whatever it would be a little bit more worrisome for me. (Diabetes-S19)


Nature of the information
  • I think I would feel totally fine with that—unless like the topics of the study or whatever they found was something alarming. (Biobank-C04)