Table 1.
MDMA–sleep deprivation study | Dexamphetamine–sleep deprivation study | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Bosker et al. 2012) | (Hjalmdahl et al. 2012) | |||||
MDMA | Sleep deprivation | MDMA + sleep deprivation | Dexamphetamine | Sleep deprivation | Dexamphetamine + sleep deprivation | |
Road tracking | No effecta | Increased SDLPb | Increased SDLPb | No effecta | Increased SDLPb | Increased SDLPc |
Impairment > BAC 0.8 mg/mLb | Impairment > BAC 0.8 mg/mLb | Impairment > BAC 0.5 mg/mL SDLPb | Relevance of impairment undecided (95 % CI drug effect includes BAC 0.5 mg/mL as well as 0)c | |||
Car following | No effecta | No effecta | No effecta | Dose-related improvement of phase delaya | Impairment of phase delayb | Impairment of phase delayb |
Risk taking | Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | Improvement RT to crossing carsa | Improvement RT to crossing carsa | Improvement RT to crossing carsa |
Laboratory measures of skills related to driving | Neutral on most measuresa | Impairment of attention and impulse controlb | Impairment of attention and impulse controlb | Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed |
Improvement on rapid information processinga | ||||||
Subjective measures | Increased arousala | Decreased arousalb | Decreased arousalb | Decreased sleepinessa | Increased sleepinessb | Increased sleepinessb |
RT reaction time
aNeutral effects or “stimulating effects”
b“Impairing” effects
cImpairments associated with a wide 95 % CI, which indicate a large variety in response; some subjects are as impaired as under alcohol, and others perform as under placebo